OUR ANCESTORS, The Viking Age, Uncategorized

WHEN ENGLAND WAS PART OF A VIKING EMPIRE – CLAN CARRUTHERS CCIS

cropped-wide-banner-with-new-crestnorse

WHEN ENGLAND WAS PART OF A VIKING EMPIRE

 

EVERY PERSON YOU READ ABOUT IS A CARRUTHERS ANCESTOR, INCLUDING WINSTON CHURCHILL IN THE SOURCES

 

The Saga of Ragnar Lothbrok refers to London as “the finest city in Scandinavia.”  This seems like quite a mistake, considering London is the capital of England and sits on the east coast of Britain.  However for the skalds who composed the old saga, London was indeed in Scandinavia, for England was once part of a Viking empire. 

This part of English history is almost always glossed over or simply not mentioned at all. The tidier narrative is that Vikings invaded Britain in the 9th century, quickly knocked down most of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, but were eventually halted by the founder of England, Alfred the Great.  Most history books are silent on what happens after that, before picking up the national story with the Norman Conquest in 1066.

But the whole story is a great deal more complicated.  England was indeed a part of a large North Sea Empire founded by Vikings long after Alfred’s death.  This does not diminish the accomplishments of Alfred and the English. Instead, the whole story helps us to appreciate how complex the reality of England is.  Read on, and it will soon all make more sense.

 

Back Story: The Great Army, Alfred, and their Legacy

A massive host of Vikings descended upon the kingdoms of Britain around the year 865.  According to the sagas, this army was led by the sons of Ragnar Lothbrok, seeking revenge for their father, who had been executed in a pit of vipers.  The historical and archaeological records do not commit to the saga narrative. Still, they state the Great Army was made up of Vikings from all over the north, who were suddenly united under tremendously effective leadership, and were remarkably successful.

To make a very long story short, the young ruler of the last Anglo-Saxon kingdom, Alfred of Wessex, stopped the Vikings and forced them into a lasting truce.  A border or “DMZ” was marked at the old Roman road, then known as Wattling Street.  The Vikings got the northeast of Britain, and the Anglo-Saxons got the southwest.

More waves of Vikings would try their luck at taking the whole of Britain, and Alfred would spend the rest of his days trying to make his enlarged kingdom Viking-proof.  His efforts to unify and defend his people earned him the title Alfred the Great.

After Alfred’s death, his son, Edward, and his daughter, Aethelflaed, worked to retake much of the land lost to the Vikings.  It would not be until the time of Alfred’s grandson, Aethelstan I, that the Vikings would be decisively defeated.  The borders of England were set to more-or-less their current form at the Battle of Brunanburh (937).  This is often thought of as the birth of a bona fide English nation.

This is not to say that all the Vikings in England just got up and left.  The northeast of Britain had become (and in some ways continues to be) distinctly Danish in character. Though these descendants of Vikings were more prone to farming than raiding, they still retained much of their culture and identity.  Viking Sea Kings like Erik Bloodaxe, Sihtric One-eyed, and Olaf the Shoe (Amlaíb Cuarán) often ruled their domains from York.  Essentially, the north was still Viking … and English at the same time.

 

Aethelred the Unready

Aethelstan, the grandson of Alfred and the hero of Brunanburh, only knew two years of peace after that great battle.  He died young around 939 and left his newly unified kingdom to his brother.  A few successful rulers followed, but a few decades later (978), a young king named Aethelred II came to the throne.  Aethelred (or Ethelred) was nowhere near the ruler his predecessors had been and was known even in his own time as Aethelred the Unready (also known as Ethelred II or Aethelred the Un-counseled).

Smelling weakness, the Vikings, Scotts, and Irish again began raiding England.  But while King Alfred had been ready to use arms, diplomacy, and Danegeld (bribes) to manage the Vikings, Aethelred only threw money at the problem.  Under Aethelred, the English paid vast quantities of silver to the Vikings, but so ineffective was Aethelred’s leadership that he sometimes broke the treaties this silver bought. 

In a final act of weakness, Aethelred the Unready ordered a massacre of all the Danes that could be caught, whether they be Viking marauders, traders, or even settlers.  This atrocity took place on Saint Brice’s Day, 1002.

Recently, archaeologists have found mass graves in Weymouth and Oxford dated to 975-1025.  Each contains the skeletal remains of up to 50 decapitated Vikings.  DNA analysis of these remains reveals that the victims were from Scandinavia, Iceland, Russia, and the Baltic.  The term “Danes” in English sources, as always, is a catch-all term for Vikings.  It is possible that these mass graves date to the Saint Brice’s Day massacre of 1002.  If so, it is likely but one of many others that lay undiscovered.

Aethelred’s bad decisions were compounding, though.  One of the massacre victims was a woman named Gunnhild, the wife of a Danish chief and the sister of none other than Svein Forkbeard. Of course, Vikings would never ignore such a brazen and cowardly act.  The murder of Svein’s own sister made retaliation inevitable. 

Sweyn Forkbeard: Warrior, King, and Slayer of Harald Bluetooth – BaviPower

Svein (Sweyn) Forkbeard

In the mid-tenth century, much of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, were united by the great king, Harald Bluetooth.  Yes, this is the same Harald Bluetooth that Bluetooth technology is named for. However, Harald’s estranged son, Svein Forkbeard, led an open rebellion against his heavy-handed father starting in the late 970s.  Harald died or was killed sometime during that civil war.  After that, Svein became King of Denmark, though Norway and Sweden had already taken advantage of the instability and went their own way.

Svein Forkbeard was a powerful and charismatic leader who had already proved himself highly skilled in war.  Whether to take advantage of England’s disarray, avenge his people’s slaying, or both, Svein launched a series of attacks on England starting in 1004.  These culminated in a full-scale invasion of England in 1013.

The Vikings landed in the center and swept north, using the support of the entrenched Danish population there to quickly secure the area.  They then turned their attention to the wealthy southwest and the seat of Anglo-Saxon power.

 The dramatic conclusion of Svein’s invasion took place in London in the winter of 1013-1014. Svein Forkbeard’s forces assailed an English army supported by Viking mercenaries under Svein’s former ally, Thorkell the Tall.  This battle was the likely origin of the children’s nursery rhyme, “London Bridges Falling Down,” for the fortified bridges of London (like Paris before it) were crucial for resisting the Viking longships.  And yes, some elements of our collective culture really are that old (and older).

Svein Forkbeard won the day.  Aethelred the Unready fled to his wife’s family in Normandy.  Svein was crowned king, and for that brief moment, held England and Denmark along with parts of Norway and Sweden.  Svein Forkbeard was the most powerful man west of Byzantium.  He was no longer just a king … he was an emperor.

But life is uncertain, and this was especially true for the 11th century.  Svein only reigned in England for about five weeks before he suddenly died.  The English immediately recalled Aethelred the Unready (supporting his revered dynasty more so than the man who had so often failed them).  The reinvigorated English drove Svein’s son, Knut (or Canute), back to Denmark. 

The Vikings were not so easily scared off from what had been one of their most significant accomplishments, and Knut re-invaded England in 1015.  Aethelred also soon died and was replaced by his dynamic son, Edmund Ironside. 

Who was Canute, the viking who ruled England

Knut the Great

 

Edmund Ironside was a great warrior, charismatic leader, and heroic king.  But fate was not on his side, and he was up against one of the most successful Vikings of all time.  Knut scored a decisive victory over Edmund’s English in 1016, and the scion of Alfred died of wounds he sustained in that battle.

For the second time in two years, the crown of a united England was in the hands of a Viking. To underscore his legitimacy and emphasize that he was there to stay, Knut married Aethelred’s widow, Emma of Normandy. This move (bizarre and grim to the modern eye) was a 10th-11th century convention, with examples from Ireland to Russia.  The marriage of Knut to Emma was also to prove fateful.  It was partially on the grounds of this union that William the Conqueror would base his claim to the English throne half a century later.   

Circumstances continued to favor Knut.  Norway and other lands his father Svein had once controlled soon fell under his dominion, mainly through peaceful means.  His reign was long (almost 20 years), relatively tranquil, and prosperous. The effectiveness of Knut’s rule was even more evident by the disarray of the rest of western Europe at that time.  The death of Brian Boru in Ireland (1014) and the feebleness of the Capetian dynasty in France meant that Knut was almost peerless.  As his boundaries extended and his peace continued, he became known as Knut the Great.  Knut ruled his North Sea Empire primarily from England through it all, continuously presenting himself as “a true Christian monarch in the European style” (Price, 2020, p. 472).  His English and Norwegian subjects probably never loved him. Still, they eagerly accepted the stability he brought and the goodwill he was always eager to display.  

 

The Legacy of Knut the Great

Knut died in 1035.  He left several sons, including his successor by Emma, Harthacanute. Unfortunately, Knut’s heirs could not match their father’s political or military ability. As a result, the North Sea Empire quickly fell apart. Nevertheless, the urgency to rebuild it would serve as an impetus for many ambitious men over the following decades.  In 1066, both William the Conqueror and Harald Hardrada probably saw themselves as the heir to this tradition of a unified northwestern Europe.  

As for Knut’s memory, sources differ dramatically.  Almost everything from Knut’s lifetime is favorable (though much of it is deliberate propaganda, perhaps). In England, he was considered a good king, a patron of the Church, a generous and wise man, a lawgiver, and a law follower.  We are told Knut even disbanded his Viking bodyguard, entrusting himself to his English subjects. 

In Norse sources, such as the Heimskringla, a fuller picture emerges, with Knut displaying cunning, violence, and vindictiveness characteristic of the most ruthless rulers.  Later English folk tradition – perhaps embarrassed that their proud nation was dominated by a foreigner – turned on the man altogether.  They portray him in ridiculous tales recycled from old stories of Rome’s hated emperor, Caligula.  One of these paints Knut as a mad king, standing on the beach and commanding the waves not to roll up on shore. 

More often, though, Knut the Great is forgotten entirely – a footnote on the wrong side of history.  The legacy of a Viking England exists more in the fine print: for example, in Shakespeare’s Hamlet when the Danish prince is sent to England to “collect our long-neglected tribute.”

As Knut is connected to the foundations for 1066, he is a part of all of England’s remarkable history since that time.  Moreover, the legacy of the Vikings in England would prove to be inseparable from the nation itself.  Winston Churchill would later remark on the many contributions to England’s laws, legislature, industry, warfare, and its very personality that the Viking settlers would perpetually contribute.  He wrote, “the tribulations of [the years] had not reduced the strength of their original character, nor their attachment to the conquered soil.  All through English history, this strain plays a gleaming part” (1956, p. 111).  

 

 

 

Carruthers crest on flag-v2 (1)

OFFICIAL AND REGISTEREDL CLAN CARRUTHERS CCIS SINCE 1983-CLAN OF OUR ANCESTORS

SCOTTISH CLAN – IRISH CLAN – NORSE CLAN

Preserving Our Past!    Recording Our Present!  Informing Our Future!

The Ancient and Honorable Carruthers Clan CCIS

CLANCARRUTHERS1@GMAIL.COM

WIDE BANNER with NEW CREST

 

 

CLAN CARRUTHERS INT SOCIETY CCIS HISTORIAN AND GENEALOGIST

 

You can find us on our main facebook pages at :

SILVER WINGS-https://www.facebook.com/CarruthersClanLLC/

GOLD WINGS – https://www.facebook.com/carrutherscarrothers.pat.9

CLAN CARRUTHERS FAMILY HISTORY – https://www.facebook.com/CarruthersClan

CLAN CARRUTHERS CCIS – https://www.facebook.com/groups/3878691252182714

CLAN CARRUTHERS INT SOCIETY- https://www.facebook.com/groups/394653845137709

CLAN CARRUTHERS – BORDER REIVERS – https://www.facebook.com/groups/434959914239094

Disclaimer Ancient and Honorable Carruthers Clan International Socie

References

  1. Sir Winston Churchill. A History of the English Speaking Peoples: Book 1, the Birth of Britain. Reprint by Barnes and Noble. USA. 1993.
  2. Rodgers, D. & Noer, K. Sons of Vikings. KDP. The United States. 2018.
  3. Price, N. Children of Ash and Elm: A History of the Vikings. Basic Books, New York, 2020.

 

 

 

 

Gutland / Gotland, OUR ANCESTORS, The Viking Age, Uncategorized

SVEND I HARALDSSON THE FIRST VIKING KING OF ENGLAND – CARRUTHERS ANCESTOR – CLAN CARRUTHERS CCIS

WIDE BANNER with NEW CREST

SVEND I HARALDSSON THE FIRST VIKING KING OF ENGLAND WITH THE CONQUEST OF ENGLAND 1013

In 1012, England had finally secured peace and security against foreign attackers, having endured a three-year Viking raid which had culminated in the brutal murder of the Archbishop of Canterbury. But any hopes of enjoying a long spell of peace and quiet were rudely shattered in early 1013 by the arrival of an invasion force led by the King of Denmark, Svend Forkbeard.
Svend’s army conquered England so quickly that by Christmas he was in control of the kingdom, but how did he achieve this feat of arms? Was it through defeating English armies on the battlefield and subjugating the survivors? Or was it through a mass change of allegiance on the part of the English nobility and clergy?
Sweyn I of Denmark - Wikidata
The apocalypse was not slow in arriving. In the spring of 1013, less than a year after Thorkell
the Tall stopped attacking them, a new and more deadly enemy returned to menace the
English. Svend Forkbeard was back. No one knows exactly why Svend chose to invade
England in 1013. He had taken part in raids on England in the 990s and in the previous
decade, but those were plundering raids, whereas what he now proposed to do was outright
conquest. One leading theory is that he feared that AEthelred would fund an attempt by
Thorkell the Tall to become King of Denmark, like he funded Óláfr Tryggvason’s campaign
to become King of Norway in 995, which had disrupted Svend’s hegemonic rule over
Scandinavia. Óláfr ruled Norway for four years before being killed at the battle of Svolder by
a naval coalition comprised of Svend’s navy, his Norwegian son-in-law Eiríkr Hákonarson’s
forces, and Svend’s Swedish allies.
Whatever his reasons for invading England were, Svend and his invasion fleet initially sailed
to Sandwich on the south coast, before going north to the mouth of the river Humber in
northern England and landing at Gainsborough. At this point it became clear that Svend had
been in contact with several English nobles before his arrival as he was welcomed by the
locals with open arms. To secure their loyalty, Svend had his son Cnut marry AElgifu of
Northampton, the daughter of Ealdorman AElfhelm. Her family wielded a huge amount of
influence in northern Mercia and southern Northumbria at that time due to their large estates
and extended family networks. They had suffered a major setback during the palace coup at
AEthelred’s court in 1006 when Ealdorman AElfhelm was murdered, and his sons were
blinded. As a result, they had an axe to grind against AEthelred and his supporters,
particularly Eadric Streona, who had risen to prominence at their expense. In short order,
most of northern and eastern England joined Svend, and provided him with all the supplies he
needed.
Sweyn Forkbeard - Alchetron, The Free Social Encyclopedia
The reasons why the English people switched their allegiances go deeper than cultural links
and blood feuds between rival noble families though. They had suffered huge amounts of
death and destruction at the hands of Viking raiders in the previous twenty years, whilst
AEthelred had utterly failed to fulfil his duty as King and defend them from attack. When
Svend arrived, he offered them a new deal which was that if they accepted him as their king,
then in return he would stop the Viking raids. They were more than happy to accept it since
AEthelred had failed to uphold his responsibilities to them, and they thought Svend would be
able to keep his word. In addition to this, there were also family and cultural links with
Scandinavia in the Danelaw of eastern England which helped to smooth over any issues in
that region.
Svend and his army now moved south and started pillaging once they left the lands held by
his new subjects. This was enough to frighten the populations of Oxford and Winchester to
surrender without a fight in return for a promise of protection, and the rest of England soon
followed suit and surrendered to Svend. The only place which stayed loyal to AEthelred was
London. Thorkell the Tall also remained loyal to him, but that was scant consolation for
AEthelred as the rest of the kingdom decided that they would prefer to have Svend as their
king instead of him. AEthelred, along with Emma and their children, sailed with Thorkell the
Tall to the Isle of Wight where they spent Christmas, before sailing for Normandy and exile.
AEthelred’s sons by his first marriage stayed behind in England and lay low, awaiting
developments. After AEthelred had departed, London submitted to Svend, who then
demanded hostages from the entire English nobility as a safeguard against treachery.
Sweyn Forkbeard – First Viking King of Britain | Annoyz View
So, that was that. Svend had conquered England, a kingdom with far more people, money,
and land than his own, in a matter of months. The principal reason why he had been so
successful was because instead of fighting him, the English decided to change sides and join
him in his campaign against AEthelred. As the political and military momentum had shifted
in Svend’s favour due to his seemingly unending series of successes, he attracted more and
more defectors who were eager to join the winning side before it was too late. The result was
that as 1013 drew to a close, Svend enjoyed the support of most of the English nobility and
clergy, with no signs of resistance to his rule in sight.
As 1014 began, Svend was secure on the English throne. All he needed to do to make his new
title legitimate in the eyes of the rest of Christian Europe was to hold a coronation. AEthelred
was in exile in Normandy with his ducal in-laws, who were not particularly inclined to be
helpful in supporting a campaign to reconquer England. Even if AEthelred could gather an
army, cross the Channel, and get ashore without being intercepted, his chances of success
looked hopeless whilst Svend’s grip on England was so strong. But for all that things looked
set in stone, the wheel of fortune was still turning…
Carruthers crest on flag-v2 (1)

OFFICIAL AND REGISTERED CLAN CARRUTHERS SINCE 1983

Preserving the Past, Recording the Present, Informing the Future

Ancient and Honorable Carruthers Clan Int Society 

carruthersclan1@gmail.com     carrothersclan@gmail.com

cropped-wide-banner-with-new-crest.jpg

Andrew Rollo

Reviewed by Tammy Wise CHS- CHAIRMAN – Indiana USA

CLAN SEANACHAIDHI

CLAN CARRUTHERS INT SOCIETY CCIS HISTORIAN AND GENEALOGIST

You can find us on our main facebook pages at :

SILVER WINGS-https://www.facebook.com/CarruthersClanLLC/

GOLD WINGS – https://www.facebook.com/carrutherscarrothers.pat.9

CLAN CARRUTHERS FAMILY HISTORY – https://www.facebook.com/CarruthersClan

CLAN CARRUTHERS CCIS – https://www.facebook.com/groups/3878691252182714

CLAN CARRUTHERS INT SOCIETY- https://www.facebook.com/groups/394653845137709

CLAN CARRUTHERS – BORDER REIVERS – https://www.facebook.com/groups/434959914239094

Disclaimer Ancient and Honorable Carruthers Clan International Society
The Viking Age, Uncategorized

CLAN CARRUTHERS – THE VIKINGS AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE U.K.

THE VIKINGS AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE U.K.

 

cropped-wide-banner-with-new-crest.jpg

 

Vikings were feared and respected. Some viewed and portrayed them as godless pagans, barbarian invaders. Others looked up to them, regarding them as brave, fearless legendary warriors.

Viking Ship found carved in stone on Gotland (Swedish island)

Vikings formed part of a complex and sophisticated Scandinavian culture. They originated from what are now Norway, Sweden and Denmark, though there are mentions in historical records of Finnish, Estonian Varaginian and Saami Vikings as well.

As well as raiders they were traders, reaching as far east as the rivers of Russia and the Caspian Sea, far across the Atlantic where they would land on the coastline of North America ten centuries before Columbus; poets, composing verse and prose sagas of great power, and artists, creating works of astonishing beauty. While the Vikings had the runic alphabet, they didn’t have written history, it was transmitted orally. These seafaring warriors known collectively as Vikings or Norsemen (“Northmen”) began by raiding coastal sites, especially undefended monasteries, in the British Isles in 793 CE.

Terror descended on the coast of Northumbria (U.K), as armed raiders attacked the defenceless monastery of St Cuthbert on Lindisfarne. The terrified monks watched helplessly as these invaders made off with a haul of treasure and a clutch of captives, mainly monks most likely. It was the first recorded raid by the Vikings, who would prey on coastal communities in north-western Europe as well as parts of modern-day Russia, Iceland, Greenland and Newfoundland for more than two centuries. The attack and plunder of Lindisfarne echoed throughout the next 300 years of European history, what historians refer to as The Viking Age, had begun.

Lindisfarne Raid: Viking Ships arriving in Britain as depicted in an English illuminated manuscrpit, c. 1130.

The exact reasons for Vikings to leave their homeland remain unclear, but we do know that at first they were looking for riches and not land which out rules the theory that they were overpopulated. It is a historic fact that Europe was growing richer, fuelling the growth of trading centres such as Dorestad and Quentovic on the Continent and Hamwic (now Southampton), London, Ipswich and York in England. Scandinavian furs were highly prized in the new trading markets. Their knowledge on new sailing technology and inner conflicts between European kingdoms would be used to expand their fortune-seeking activities into the North Sea and beyond. Special ship construction techniques made the long ships and larger dragon ships versatile enough to sail great distances, carry up to 200 men, withstand rough seas while still being light enough to drag over land or carry through portages. They traded all the goods of the north – furs, amber, iron and timber – for all the goods of the south – silver, gold, silks and spices. And all along the trade routes, the Vikings traded in slaves. It is worth noting that women in Viking society had more power than most other European women of the time. They could divorce their husbands, own some property and sell their own handicrafts. Some women became wealthy landowners too.

So Vikings took to raiding towns, churches and monasteries in Christian faith countries, e.g. Francia; many of the attacks took place on the coasts as they were easiest to reach. With their swift and easily landed ships, they quickly swarm over the communities, killing and looting, and just as fast returned to their ships and left. They were gone before any defence or counter-attack could be made. Strangely enough, for most of the men who went plundering, it was only part time. They often returned in time for harvest in the fall. However, raiding was very profitable and many farmers did become full time pirates and raiders.

Vikings presence in Britain

Gradually, Viking raiders began to stay, first in winter camps, then settling in land they had seized, mainly in the east and north of England. Outside Anglo-Saxon England, to the north of Britain, the Vikings took over and settled in Iceland, the Faroes and Orkney (an archipelago in the Northern Isles of Scotland), becoming farmers and fishermen, and sometimes going on summer trading or raiding voyages. Orkney became powerful, and from there the Earls of Orkney ruled most of Scotland. To this day, especially on the north-east coast, many Scots still bear Viking names.

To the west of Britain, the Isle of Man became a Viking kingdom. The island still has its Tynwald, or ting-vollr (assembly field), a reminder of Viking rule. In Ireland, the Vikings raided around the coasts and up the rivers. They founded the cities of Dublin, Cork and Limerick as Viking strongholds. Meanwhile, back in England, the Vikings took over Northumbria, East Anglia and parts of Mercia. In 866 they captured modern York (Viking name: Jorvik) and made it their capital. They continued to press south and west. The kings of Mercia and Wessex resisted as best they could, but with little success until the time of Alfred of Wessex, the only king of England to be called ‘the Great’.

Portrait of King Alfred the Great (849-899 AD).

King Alfred ruled from 871-899 AD and after many trials and tribulations he defeated the Vikings at the Battle of Edington in 878. After the battle, the Viking leader Guthrum converted to Christianity. In 886 Alfred took London from the Vikings and fortified it. The same year he signed a treaty with Guthrum. The treaty partitioned England between Vikings and English. The Viking territory became known as the Danelaw. It comprised the north-west, the north-east and east of England. Here, people would be subject to Danish laws. Alfred became king of the rest. Alfred’s grandson, Athelstan, became the first true King of England. He led an English victory over the Vikings at the Battle of Brunaburh in 937, and his kingdom for the first time included the Danelaw. In 954, Eirik Bloodaxe, the last Viking king of York, was killed and his kingdom was taken over by English earls.

England, 878 AD.

Moreover, in 991, during the reign of Aethelred ‘the Unready’ (‘ill-advised’), Olaf Tryggvason’s Viking raiding party defeated the Anglo-Saxon defenders (recorded in the poem The Battle of Maldon), with Aethelred responding by paying ‘Danegeld’ in an attempt to buy off the Vikings. So the Vikings were not permanently defeated – England was to have four Viking kings between 1013 and 1042. The greatest of these was King Cnut, who was king of Denmark as well as of England. As a Christian, he did not force the English to obey Danish law; instead he recognised Anglo-Saxon law and customs. He worked to create a north Atlantic empire that united Scandinavia and Britain. Unfortunately, he died at the age of 39, and his sons had short, troubled reigns.

The final Viking invasion of England came in 1066, when Harald Hardrada sailed up the River Humber and marched to Stamford Bridge with his men. His battle banner was called Land-waster. The English king, Harold Godwinson, marched north with his army and defeated Hardrada in a long and bloody battle. The English had repelled the last invasion from Scandinavia. Nonetheless, immediately after the battle, King Harold heard that William of Normandy had landed in Kent with yet another invading army. With no time to rest, Harold’s army marched swiftly back south to meet this new threat. The exhausted English army fought the Normans at the Battle of Hastings on 14th October, 1066. At the end of a long day’s fighting the Normans had won, King Harold was dead, and William was the new king of England. The irony is that William was of Viking descent: his great-great-great-grandfather Rollo was a Viking who in 911 had invaded Normandy. ** Carruthers have a genealogy link to King Robert I also know as King Rollo ).   His people had become French over time, but in one sense this final successful invasion of England was another Viking one.

Interesting facts:

  • Viking Age Scandinavia’s runic alphabet, the Futhark, is named after its first six symbols (futhar, and k). During the Viking Age (800-1050 CE), runestones were often painted and the carved lettering filled in with bright colors. Runestones were raised along waterways and property boundaries, by road intersections, and on hilltops so people could find and read them.
  • English and Frankish Christian priests and monks had begun missionary tours to the Viking lands from the 700s to 800s but it wasn’t until King Harald Bluetooth was baptized in 965 that Christianity took a firmer hold in Denmark.
  • Viking warriors usually went into battle bareheaded. The whole horned-helm idea came about in Victorian times when Vikings were romanticized.
  • In English speaking countries, names for days of the week come mainly from Norse gods – Tuesday from Tiw or Týr, Wednesday from Woden (Odin), Thursday from Thor and so on. Many of their other words have also become part of English, for example egg, steak, law, die, bread, down, fog, muck, lump and scrawny.

 

Preserving Our Past, Recording Our Present, Informing Our Future

Ancient and Honorable Clan Carruthers Int Society CCIS  LLc

carruthersclan1@gmail.com              carrothersclan@gmail.com

cropped-wider-banner-light-blue-1.jpg

 

MARY STUART

CLAN CARRUTHERS INT SOCIETY CCIS HISTORIAN AND GENEALOGIST

You can find us on facebook at :

https://www.facebook.com/carrutherscarrothers.pat.9

https://www.facebook.com/CarruthersClan/

https://www.facebook.com/CarruthersClanLLC

Disclaimer Ancient and Honorable Carruthers Clan International Soci