Uncategorized

Evolution of the word Viking

HOW VIKINGS GOT THEIR NAME – ETYMOLOGY OF THE VIKINGS

 

Some researchers derive the word “Viking” from the Old Norse “víkingr”, which means “man from the bay ” or “man from the port”. Earlier, among the Scandinavians themselves, the opinion prevailed that it could be derived from the name of the Norwegian region Vik (Viken) which is located on the shore of the Oslo fjord, and this version still prevails in the modern Norwegian province of Bohunsen which is located in this region. Yet in all medieval sources, the inhabitants of Vika are not called “Vikings”.

How Vikings Got Their Name – Etymology of the Vikings

Some believed that the word “Viking” comes from the word vi’k – bay, gulf; Viking – the one who hides in the bay. But in this case it can also be applied to peaceful merchants. Finally, the word “Viking” was attempted to associate with the Old English wic, denoting a trade center, a city, a fortified camp – a synonym for the old Russian word “commodity”, which did not mean a product of trade, but a fortified camp of the southern Varyags Cossacks . This theory is still prevalent in England. There is also a version that this term is associated with the verb wiking, which earlier in the north of Norway meant “to go to sea to acquire wealth and fame.”

 

The modern researcher T.N. Jackson considers it unlikely that the term “vikingr” means “fortified camp” and derives it from the Danish wic, which dates back to the Latin vicus, which in the late Roman Empire meant a city block or a small handicraft and trade settlement, including the military camp.

 

At present times, the hypothesis of the Swedish scientist F. Askeberg, which considers the term to be derived from the verb vikja – “to turn”, “to deviate”, is considered acceptable. Viking, according to his interpretation, is a man who swam out of the house, and left his homeland. To him that is, a sea warrior, a pirate who went on a march for loot. It is curious that in ancient sources this word was often called the enterprise itself – a predatory campaign, than a person participating in it. And the concepts were strictly separated: a trading enterprise and a predatory enterprise. Note that in the eyes of the Scandinavians, the word “Viking” also had a negative connotation. In the 13th century Icelandic sagas, people who were engaged in robbery and piracy were called unbridled and bloodthirsty by the Vikings.

According to another version put forward by the Swedish researcher B. Daggfeldt and supported, in particular, by the recognized etymologist Anatoly Lieberman, the word Viking goes back to the same root as the Old Norse term vika sjóvar , meaning “nautical mile”, “distance between shifts of rowers ” and formed from the weik root or wîk of the pro- Germanic verb wîkan.

There is a connection with the Old Swedish verb vika and with the similar Old Norse verb víkja with the meaning “to change rowers”, as well as “to retreat, deviate, turn, step aside, give way”. The term vika most likely appeared before the use of sails by the North-West Germans. In this case, the point was that the tired rower was “removed”, “shifted to the side”, “gave way” on the rowing bench for a replaceable, rested rower. In Old Norse language, the female form of víking formed from vika or víkja could originally mean “sea voyage with rowers changing”, that is, “long sea expedition”. If this hypothesis is true, then “to go to the Viking” should mean the passage of a large segment of the path on which it is necessary to change rowers often. The male form of víkingr meant a participant in such a long voyage, a long-distance navigator.

The word Viking originally belonged to any distant seafarers, but during the period of Scandinavian maritime domination, it was fixed to the Scandinavians. This version brings together the etymology of Western European Norman-Vikings and Eastern European Vikings-Rus (if, like most researchers, to accept that the word Rus goes back to the Old Norse root rods- “paddle”). In this case, both the Viking and Russian originate from the roots associated with oars and rowing. But this theory is not supported by the fact that the word “Viking” was negative in color, while the ancient Scandinavians respected participants in long-distance wanderings, so it is not true that the word Vikings wore a negative connotation in the Scandinavians.

As Anatoly Lieberman points out, “in Scandinavia, the Vikings were called brave men who were making military expeditions to foreign lands”. The word Vikings in Scandinavia acquired a negative meaning only after the military expeditions of the Viking era lost their meaning. In his opinion, the term Vikings suffered the same fate as the term Berserkers. But even in the sagas recorded in the 13th century, in which the Berserkers, who were often considered to be heroes of berserkers, are depicted as robbers. It is often described, for example, how old men complained that in their youth they “went to the Viking” (that is, on an expedition), but now they are weak and are not capable of such acts.

In 2005, the Irish medieval historian Francis Byrne indicated that the word viking was not derived from Old Norse, but it existed in the Old French language in the 8th century even before the Viking era.

Note that in the old French language the words “Norman” and “Viking” are not quite synonymous. The Normans called the Franks all “northerners”, including Slavs, Rus, Finns, etc., and not just Scandinavians. In Germany, in the 10th – 11th centuries the Vikings were called askemans – “ash people”, that is, “swimming in ash trees”, since the upper plating and masts of Viking military ships were made of this tree. The Anglo-Saxons called them Danes, regardless of whether they sailed exactly from Denmark, or from Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Finland, Russia. In Ireland, they were all distinguished by their hair color and were called Finngalls, that is, “bright aliens” (if they were talking about Norwegians) or dougalls – “dark aliens” (if they were Danes). In Byzantium in the XI century they were called Varangas. In Muslim Spain, they were called madhus, more precisely, al-majus, which means “pagan monsters”.

According to the British historian T.D. Kendrick , the word comes from the Old Norse víkingr mikill – a good navigator; the expression “set off í víking ” was the usual name for a sea voyage for the purpose of trade or plunder.    Anokhin

 

Preserving Our Past, Recording Our Present, Informing Our Future

Ancient and Honorable Carruthers Clan Int Society LLC

carruthersclan1@gmail.com

coacarrutehrs

 

 

The History of Gutland, The Viking Age, Uncategorized

CLAN CARRUTHERS – FEMALE VIKING WARRIORS

CLAN CARRUTHERS INT SOCIETY CCIS

cropped-wider-banner-light-blue-1.jpg

Female Viking Warrior’s

Remarkable grave sheds new light on ancient society

femalewarrior

An incredible grave containing the skeleton of a Viking warrior, long thought to be male, has been confirmed as female, researchers say.

The 10th-century grave, known as Bj. 581, was first discovered on the Swedish island of Bjorko in the late 19th century. Stunning artifacts found in the grave indicated that it belonged to a high-status Viking warrior, who, for over a century, was assumed to be male.

In 2017, however, experts published the results of a DNA analysis that revealed the skeleton was female. The amazing discovery garnered a great deal of attention and sparked plenty of debate.

In a study published this week in the journal Antiquity, the researchers responded to critics of the original study, explaining that they analyzed the correct skeleton and that there was only one set of human remains in the grave. “The simple and secure conclusion is that we have the right individual, who was buried alone, and that this person has been proven to be biologically female,” they explained.

The array of weapons discovered in grave Bj.581.

The array of weapons discovered in grave Bj.581. (photographs courtesy of Christer Åhlin, Swedish History Museum/Antiquity Publications Ltd.)

The experts also reiterated the woman’s warrior status. “In our opinion, Bj.581 was the grave of a woman who lived as a professional warrior and was buried in a martial environment as an individual of rank,” they wrote. “To those who do take issue, however, we suggest that it is not supportable to react only now, when the individual has been shown to be female, without explaining why neither the warrior interpretations nor any supposed source-critical factors were a problem when the person in Bj.581 was believed to be male.”

The warrior woman was buried in elaborate clothing and her grave contained a stunning array of weapons, including a sword, an ax, 25 armor-piercing arrows, a fighting knife, two lances and two spears. She was also buried with two horses, underlining her high status in Viking society.

Intriguingly, a bag of gaming pieces was also placed in the warrior’s lap and a gaming board was propped up beside her skeleton.

Artist's impression of the occupant of grave Bj.581 as a high-status female warrior.

Artist’s impression of the occupant of grave Bj.581 as a high-status female warrior. (Drawing by Tancredi Valeri/Antiquity Publications Ltd.)

Set against this backdrop, the team behind the study noted other Viking women likely bore arms.

“We would be very surprised if she was alone in the Viking world; other women may have taken up arms in the same seasonal or opportunistic context as many male Viking raiders,” they wrote. “A few may have risen to positions of command—indeed, the quality of the individual’s clothing, and the presence of the gaming set, implies that she may have been one of them.”

Gaming sets are typically associated with Viking military leaders, according to the researchers, who noted they are often found in larger boat graves.

Drawing of grave Bj. 581. (Drawing by Þórhallur Þráinsson/Antiquity Publications Ltd.)

Drawing of grave Bj. 581. (Drawing by Þórhallur Þráinsson/Antiquity Publications Ltd.)

Despite the incredible glimpse into Viking society that the grave offers, many aspects of the woman’s life will remain unknown. “Can we be sure that the person in Bj.581 was a woman, in a gendered sense? No, we cannot. She may have taken on a man’s social role, while retaining a feminine identity,” explained the study’s authors.

The grave is one of many fascinating archaeological finds from the time of the Vikings. Last year, for example, a Viking “Thor’s hammer” was discovered in Iceland and archaeologists in Norway used ground-penetrating radar technology to reveal an extremely rare Viking longship.

Also in 2018, an 8-year-old girl discovered a 1,500-year-old sword in a Swedish lake and an incredible trove of silver treasure linked to the era of a famous Viking king was discoveredon an island in the Baltic Sea. Hundreds of 1,000-year-old silver coins, rings, pearls, and bracelets were found on the German island of Ruegen.

Plan of grave Bj. 581 by Harald Olsson

Plan of grave Bj. 581 by Harald Olsson (Arbman [1943]/Antiquity Publications Ltd.)

In 2017, an incredibly well-preserved Viking sword was found by a reindeer hunter on a remote mountain in Southern Norway. In 2016, archaeologists in Trondheim, Norway, unearthed the church where Viking King Olaf Haraldsson was first enshrined as a saint.

 

Gaming pieces from the warrior's grave.

Separately in 2016, a tiny Viking crucifix was found in Denmark.

**  This is interesting to the Carruthers Clan, because Denmark was once part of the Aachen Forest, where the Carruthers or Ashmen were given land by the Pope to harvest their ash trees and make the longboats.   It has also been stated before that the Ashmen/Carruthers were not pagans, but some of the first Christians.

Submitted by : Barbara and Don Davis, Carruthers Clan Sergeant of Arms

 

Preserving Our Past, Recording Our Present, Informing Our Future

Ancient and Honorable Carruthers Clan Int Society LLC

carruthersclan1@gmail.com

 

cropped-coagraywide.jpg

You can find us on facebook at :

https://www.facebook.com/carrutherscarrothers.pat.9

https://www.facebook.com/CarruthersClan/

https://www.facebook.com/CarruthersClanLLC

 

Disclaimer Ancient and Honorable Carruthers Clan International Society
Disclaimer Ancient and Honorable Carruthers Clan International Society CCIS LLC is the official licensed and registered Clan of the Carruthers Family.  This Clan is presently registered in the United States and Canada, and represents members worldwide.  All content provided on our web pages is for family history use only.  The CCIS is the legal owner of all websites, and makes no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on these sites or by following any link provided. The CCIS will not be responsible for any errors or omissions or availability of any information. The CCIS will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. We do not sell, trade or transfer to outside parties any personal identifications. For your convenience, we may provide links to various outside parties that may be of interest to you. The content on CCIS is design to support your research in family history.      ( CCIS -LLC copyright 2017 - 2020)
Uncategorized

CLAN CARRUTHERS – VIKINGS, PICTS AND THE MACALPINS

CLAN CARRUTHERS INT SOCIETY CCIS

 

cropped-wider-banner-light-blue-1.jpg

Vikings, Picts and the MacAlpins

viking222

 Looking at the 9th century. The 800s saw the demise of the four kingdoms which had developed territories from the 400s, including the progressive downfall of the Pictish kingdom towards the end of the century. But alongside this, modern Scotland and our modern place names were quickly progressing towards the beginning of their development.

The Aachenmen, Ashmen, Carruthers DNA was found in two large waves from Gutland.  One in the 400 AD and one in the early 800 AD.

Viking invasions had begun in 793 AD and had initially focussed on north east England, the northern Isles, the western Isles and the west cost of Scotland. Iona was a particular target and this developed violently in the early 800s.

The capture and settlement of the Orkney Isles in c.800 was a hugely important tactical success for the Vikings who were to launch invasions onto the north coast of mainland Scotland during the later part of this century. These raids gained the Vikings the southern lands of their kingdom; known today as Sutherland.

The Vikings had first attacked Iona in 795, then again in 802. In 806, the Vikings killed 68 monks from the monastery on Iona. The bay now known as Martyr’s Bay is named in memory of them and may possibly be where the majority of the killings took place, or where the Viking raiders landed; although this is unknown. The Martyrs of Iona feast day is the 12th January.

The deadly plundering of Iona was followed by further attacks in 807 and 825. After populating the Outer Hebrides in c.825, the Vikings were attacked by the Irish Gaels and defeated the Irish fleet in 869. It is from this period of Norse overlordship that many place names on the Outer and Inner Hebrides originate.

 

IConstantine I (d.877 ), or Caustantin mac Cinaeda, was the eldest son of Kenneth MacAlpin.  He was nicknamed An Finn-Shoichleach, "The Wine-Bountiful."t is thought that Pictish kings may have dominated Dál Riada into the early 800s, with Caustantín mac Fergusa (793–820) ( Carruthers DNA Marker ), perhaps placing his son Domnall on the throne of Dál Riada from 811. It appears that the Scots-Gaels of Dál Riada became allies of the Picts against the Vikings. Amongst those killed during the earliest Viking invasions were the two most powerful men in the former kingdoms; the Pictish leader, Eógan mac Óengusa, and the leader of Dál Riada, Áed mac Boanta, who were both among the dead after the Vikings in 839 delivered a major defeat to the united forces of Picts and Scots-Gaels.

 

 

 

The Vikings did appear to cohabit in some areas. Vikings coexisted with the Irish Scot-Gaels in south-west Scotland, where the combined territory became known as Gall-Gaidel, the Norse-Irish, which has become modern Galloway.

The loss by the Scot-Gaels of Dál Riada of their Hebridean territory to the Vikings may have progressed the gaelicisation of the Pictish kingdoms, which began the process of adopting the Gaelic language and customs in this century. This appears to have led to a merger of the Gaelic and Pictish crowns, but it is unclear whether the Picts were eventually wiped out or assimilated into the Gaelic culture altogether.

King Kenneth MacAlpinThis process culminated in the rise of Kenneth MacAlpin in the 840s. ( He carries the Carruthers DNA Marker ) Kenneth is known as the first combined King of Scots and Picts and died on the 13th February 858 from a tumour. Upon his death, Kenneth is recorded as being King of Picts, with the terms Alba and Scotland still not in use.

The MacAlpin household then became the leaders of a combined Gaelic-Pictish kingdom which progressed towards the end of the century and saw the Viking ascendency in Scotland slow in its progression. There was still division within this kingdom and the MacAlpins were ousted in 878 when Áed mac Cináeda was killed by Giric mac Dúngail. The MacAplin household returned to power on the death of Giric in 889.

After raids in modern Perthshire and Fife in 839 and 866; in 867 the Vikings turned their attention to Northumbria, forming the Kingdom of Jorvik (York). Viking territories in the Scottish coastal and island regions remained strong and in 870 the Norsemen stormed the Briton fortress of Dumbarton (Alt Clut), destroying the remains of that once strong Kingdom. Subsequently the Vikings conquered much of England except for the Kingdom of Wessex.

Scotland was now divided between the Viking kingdom of the Islands and coastal territories and the Pictish-Gaelic kingdom of the MacAlpins.

I believe the excellent map in the image was produced by a very good cartographer for History Scotland magazine.

Preserving Our Past, Recording Our Present, Informing Our Future

Ancient and Honorable Carruthers Clan Int Society LLC

carruthersclan1@gmail.com

 

 

cropped-wider-banner-light-blue-1.jpg

THOMAS E CARRUTHERS

CLAN CARRUTHERS INT SOCIETY HISTORIAN AND GENEALOGISTS

 

You can find us on facebook at :

https://www.facebook.com/carrutherscarrothers.pat.9

https://www.facebook.com/CarruthersClan/

https://www.facebook.com/CarruthersClanLLC

 

Disclaimer Ancient and Honorable Carruthers Clan International Society
Uncategorized

Viking Treasures of Dublin

Viking Treasures of Dublin

 

I admit I went to Dublin to see three exquisite pieces of Irish workmanship, the Book of Kells at Trinity Library, the Tara Brooch, and the Ardagh chalice. (And they did not disappoint!) I knew the National Museum of Ireland, Archeology, on Kildare Street also housed remains of Dublin’s Viking past. Nothing prepared me for the treasure trove of Norse weaponry, jewelry, and everyday artifacts in this superb collection.

Viking era Dublin

Model of Viking era settlement at Dublin. “Dubh linn” means “black pool” in Irish, a tidal pool where the Norwegians first landed on the Liffey and set their camp.

Raiders from Norway chose Ireland as their target for pillage, just as it was raiders from Denmark who struck the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms in Angle-land – England – to Ireland’s immediate East. Dublin lies on the East coast of the island of Ireland. The River Liffey provided all the Norwegian seafarers needed to access the indigenous settlements already established there. Norwegian Vikings effectively founded Dublin in 841, using it first as an over-wintering camp. It grew to one of their most active trading centres, handling the usual range of goods the far-travelling Scandinavians had access to: prized amber from the Baltic, silk from the near East (carried up the trade rivers of modern-day Russia), Saxon jewellery and coal, woollen goods, walrus tusks and hides from the Arctic Circle. Under the Norse, Dublin also grew to become one of the great slave centres for their trafficking in human flesh.

Norwegian swordsand spearsOver one hundred fifty hoards have been found from Viking Era Ireland, comprising mostly silver and bronze items. Along with the burial goods these folk were consigned to their graves with, and accidental losses now recovered, rich and diverse material remains provide vivid glimpses into the ways these mostly Norwegian raiders both changed and were changed by the Irish they settled amongst.

 

 

 

 

Swords and spear points. Nearly all of the recovered weapons show signs of                                                                                                      Norwegian                                                                                                                                                                           manufacture.

 

Swords and skeggoxesThe Viking incursion into Ireland meant a huge influx of silver was carried into the island – silver dirhams and Kufic coins from trade originating in Islamic lands, and masses of hack silver (broken bits of jewellery, coin fragments, slices cut from simple silver rods) brought as booty from pillaging targets along the shores of Frankland.

 

 

 

Swords, and skeggoxes. Also on display was a human skull, with a head injury frighteningly identical to that I describe as killing Yrling’s right hand man Une in “Sidroc the Dane”. You’ll forgive me for not photographing it; it was too terrible to look at.

 

Gold HiltIrish workers in precious metals, already amongst the most highly skilled on Earth, where quick to adopt Scandinavian motifs into their work. Great penannular pins and brooches featuring bosses, thistles, kite-shaped pins, arm rings, and silver mesh work appeared for the first time in Ireland, adapted from Norse models.

 

 

 

Gold dressed hilt on elite warrior’s sword. Only a very rich war-chief would have carried this. Surpassing beauty.

 

 

 

Thistle Brooch

Thistle brooch. I has so thoroughly associated this motif with Scotland and Ireland that to learn it was actually carried from Scandinavia was an eye-opener.

Silver pin

Silver pin.

Pin with bosses

Penanualar pin with bosses, another style unknown to the Ireland before the Vikings.

 

Gilt pin

Gilt pin.

 

 

ShoeThe anaerobic nature of Irish peat bogs has yielded many finds of organic materials in a high state of preservation. I had seen the stray 9th or 10th century shoe on display at Jorvik or the National Museums of Denmark or Sweden; here was a whole array of them, along with leather shoulder bags, water (or ale/wine) bags, and a jaw-dropping leather knife scabbard.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leather scabbardLeather knife scabbard. Sublime example, thanks to preservation in peat.

 

 

All photos taken in the exhibition halls of the National Museum of Ireland, Archeology, Kildare Street. I am very eager to return – I felt I could spend a week poring over this collection, and a docent told me it is but a fraction of what is held in storage!

Brooches and Linen smoother

These warriors brought their wives with them at some point. Typical Norse paired shoulder brooches of bronze, from which glass bead necklaces were strung, from female burial sites.         Octavia Randolph

 

Preserving the Past, Recording the Present, Informing the Future

Ancient and Honorable Carruthers Clan Int Society LLC

carruthersclan1@gmail.com

 

carruthersCOA

 

 

Uncategorized

The Isle of Viking Women

The Isle of Viking Women?

Women on the Isle of Man had more rights than on the adjacent isles up to modern times.

Image result for Manx women

Manx Women had the vote from 1881 – 37 years before the UK. This may be partly because of the inheritance of a Celtic / Viking legal system.

If you don’t live on the Isle of Man, then you may not know that the Island introduced Votes for (some) Women in 1881, 37 years before the UK, and pretty much the first place in the world. Nearly everyone who lives here knows that already. Possibly related to this is that Emmeline Pankhurst’s Mum was Manx. The roots for this progressiveness may lie in the Island’s Viking and Celtic past.

Vikings took control of this Island in the Irish sea in the 800s and used it as a naval base until the 1200s. The Norse established the Island’s parliament, Tynwald, in around the year 1000 (the name Tynwald is from Tingvollr: ‘assembly field’ in Old Norse). Other traces of Norse heritage include placenames and people’s names, dozens of carved runestone memorials to both men and women, and viking-age burials like the one of the ‘Pagan lady’ in Peel, full of grave goods from across the Viking world. Things weren’t so great for slaves, unfortunately, as in other societies of that time.

The Norse may have been bloodthirsty and warlike, but they did set up a legal system, which combined with Celtic traditions, has evolved up to the present day. Under Manx law, women had far more rights than their English counterparts. All through medieval times and to the modern period, a Manx woman could own land and goods, keep property through her marriage, and could bequeathe property as she wished. When a woman died her goods could not be plundered by the husband: the courts would step in to ensure her children inherited her goods, and would appoint her relatives as guardians. This is quite unlike English law, where a woman (and most of what she owned) was by default seen as the property of her husband, from Norman times up until the 1800s. Scotland and Wales both had more legal rights for women until about 1700 than the South of England: the North of England, with its Norse heritage, had customary but not official inheritance rights for women until about 1700.

Womens rights on the Island went backwards a bit in the late 1700s when the British Crown took control of the Island, but by Victorian times, and the suffrage struggles, Manx women were still used to having decent legal and customary rights.

This brings us to the Manx Pankhurst connection. Emmeline Pankhurst’s Mum, Sophia Craine, was born on the Isle of Man in 1843, and met and married a Robert Goulden of Manchester. Living in Manchester, they were both active in anti-slavery and women’s suffrage movements, with friends in the Isle of Man and Manchester working for the women’s vote. In the 1870s, Sophia took her daughter Emmeline to numerous suffrage events.

In 1880, the leader of the UK women’s movement, Lydia Becker of Manchester, visited the Island to instigate a demand for ‘Votes for Women’ amongst the Manx. Unexpectedly, she was completely successful, and in 1881 the Manx Parliament passed a law extending the right to vote to single or widowed women with property. The sudden success was probably helped by all the Island’s press being in favour – the most conservative newpaper at the time was run by a widow. Also there wasn’t a party system on the island, which may have helped (for complicated reasons, the British Liberals and Conservatives both felt that women having the vote could benefit their opponents). The Island’s small size probably helped – eg just having the one conservative newspaper, which by chance was run by a woman.

The debate in the Island’s Parliament was quite something. The proposal was led by a Mr Sherwood, who jollied his colleagues along with jokes: to paraphrase: ‘Of course, we could even have women members of Parliament, though we would have to widen the seats…’, ‘That would be broadening the franchise’….’If the bachelors of the Island don’t like single ladies having the vote, then they can always remedy the situation by marrying them!’

So a tiny country with its own parliament, and a Norse / Celtic legal system, led the way, in being one of the very first places in the world where women had the right to elect members of their parliament. Slightly ironic for somewhere called the Isle of Man.

Preserving Our Past, Recording Our Present, Informing Our Future

Ancient and Honorable Clan Carruthers Int Society

carruthersclan1@gmail.com

carruthersCOA

Uncategorized

Carruthers From Gutland

Hello Carruthers Clan

Below is some information that should direct you on your further search.

To reiterate what we sent last time:

You are correct that your clan was called Ashman.  Aachen is the name of land on what is now the northern section of Europe, from Germany through part of France.  This land was protected by the Pope in Rome.  Sections of this land was given to your ancestors to cut down the Ash Trees and use them for building boats.  Aachen became Ashmen.

Prince Philip of the UK, also had a large section of land next to them , and yes owned by the Roman Pope. It is believed that Prince Philip and the Aachen-men did favors for the Pope and were rewarded with land.   

But here are a group of names of people you are descendants from which may help you learn more.

 

Wiglaff

Waefmund

Herdred

Haeocyrs

Hygelac

You are not descendants of King Sigrid.  

The last name, Hygelac,  is the most prevalent in your search.

The Ashmen were from Ostergutland, which means east Gutland.  

I know your experience is in Celtic History, so I am hoping we can help you at least get started.  When researching your family were Geats or Gots.

Here is a little help:

The Geats, and sometimes Goths) were a North Germanic tribe inhabiting what is now Götaland in southern Sweden. The name of the Geats also lives on in the Swedish provinces of Västergötland and Östergötland, the Western and Eastern lands of the Geats, the earliest known surviving mention of the Geats appears in Ptolemy, who refers to them as Goutai. In the 6th century, Jordanes writes of the Gautigoths and Ostrogoths, the Norse Sagas knows them as Gautar, Beowulf and Widsith as Gēatas. The etymology of the name Geat is similar, although not identical, to that of Goths, the names are derived from different ablaut grades of the Proto-Germanic word *geutaną, meaning to pour. They are generally accepted to have originated as heiti for men, a more specific theory about the word Gautigoths is that it means the Goths who live near the river Gaut, todays Göta älv. It might also have been a conflation of the word Gauti with a gloss of Goths, in the 17th century the name Göta älv, River of the Geats, replaced the earlier names Götälven and Gautelfr. These sources concern a raid into Frisia, ca 516, which is described in Beowulf. Some decades after the events related in this epic, Jordanes described the Geats as a nation which was bold, before the consolidation of Sweden, the Geats were politically independent of the Swedes or Svear, whose old name was Sweonas in Old English. When written sources emerge, the Geatish lands are described as part of the still very shaky Swedish kingdom, the actual story in Beowulf, however, is that the Geatish king helps a Swede to gain the throne. What historians today think is that this realm could just as well be the force behind the creation of the kingdom of Sweden. The historians make a distinction between history and the emergence of a common Swedish ethnicity. The Hervarar saga is believed to contain such traditions handed down from the 4th century, according to Curt Weibull, the Geats would have been finally integrated in the Swedish kingdom c. 1000, but according to others, it most likely took place before the 9th century, the fact that some sources are silent about the Geats indicates that any independent Geatish kingdom no longer existed in the 9th century. However, the oldest medieval Swedish sources present the Swedish kingdom as having remaining legal differences between Swedes and Geats for example in weights and measurements in miles, marks etc. They also tell us there were kings, ruling by the title of Rex Gothorum as late as in the 12th century. In the Heimskringla, Snorri Sturluson writes about battles between Norwegians and Geats. The Geats were traditionally divided into petty kingdoms, or districts. The largest one of districts was Västergötland, and it was in Västergötland that the Thing of all Geats was held every year.

 

Preserving the Past, Recording the Present, Informing the Future

Ancient and Honorable Carruthers Clan Int Society

carruthersclan1@gmail.com

cropped-coagraywide.jpg

Disclaimer Ancient and Honorable Carruthers Clan International Society CCIS LLC is the official licensed and registered Clan of the Carruthers Family.  This Clan is presently registered in the United States and Canada, and represents members worldwide.  All content provided on our web pages is for family history use only.  The CCIS is the legal owner of all websites, and makes no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on these sites or by following any link provided. The CCIS will not be responsible for any errors or omissions or availability of any information. The CCIS will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. We do not sell, trade or transfer to outside parties any personal identifications. For your convenience, we may provide links to various outside parties that may be of interest to you. The content on CCIS is design to support your research in family history.      ( CCIS -LLC copyright 2017 - 2020)
Uncategorized

How Strong Were the Vikings?

WERE THE VIKINGS REALLY AS STRONG AS THEY ARE PORTRAYED?

Were The Vikings Really As Strong As They Are Portrayed?

THE VIKING WARRIOR

In history, Vikings are known as one of the bravest warriors that do not fear death. But is that really true, or do we just think like that because of today’s popular TV shows and video games?

Vikings were people with their own religion and own beliefs, so naturally, this played a huge role on their fearlessness. For the most part, they were farmers and stayed in their homeland, but when the “Viking Age” came and they started raiding lands far from their homeland.

They raided for several reasons, but mostly it was for the loot or land, while others were more adventurous and were seeking fame and glory. The Vikings extended their reach and started attacking nearby kingdoms, such as the kingdoms West from their homeland and sometimes the ones that were in the East. Their first target were the English Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, which weren’t united under one rule and were in constant conflict between each other. They were weak and they weren’t organized.

The Norsemen weren’t well known and they came by sea which carried with them the element of surprise. There was no one to warn the English about the upcoming attacks. English monasteries, villages and even small cities were attacked by these unknown Vikings.

WHAT MADE THEM SUPERIOR?

These Vikings were barbaric to the English people and the people were slightly scared of them. Fear was ruling over the people because they could have been attacked at any time, and no one could defend them because these Vikings came out of nowhere.

The Vikings had the element of surprise, they could catch people off guard. Because of the low organization from the Englishman and the fast moving ships of the Vikings, their reaction time was slow, which means that a village could be raided and they could be gone in less then a day.

The Norseman never fought a fair battle against the other Kingdoms. Every time they fought them it was a surprise attack or it was a low organized army sent by the Anglo-Saxons which made them easy targets. If they fought a fair battle how good would they be? Most of the battles in the early and middle Viking age were like this.

BUT WHAT KIND OF WARRIORS WERE THEY?

While Vikings are very known and marketed, people always put them in the number one spot as warriors. While they were strong they don’t deserve the number one spot in the medieval period because it depends on a lot of factors.

What gave the Vikings their edge was their religion as an example. Normal people who were recruited from their homes didn’t want to die, but the Vikings were slightly different. Everyone knows their religion and knows that when they die they visit Valhalla, and enter through the gates of Valhalla as true warriors. Religion was at its peak back then and they lived by it. A person with those beliefs could easily fight till the end and will die with honor, this gave him the edge it made him fearless. He didn’t care if he died because he knew there was an afterlife, while the other person the opponent had another thing on his mind and it was to survive this battle and go home, he cared if he lived or died and death wasn’t an option. He must fight on the back lines and run if needed when things got hot.

The Vikings also had a slight physical superiority as well, they were stronger and slightly taller even though this isn’t a sure fact.

As for their equipment, it wasn’t advanced at all. They used round shields, axes, swords and spears. The famous knife they had was the Seax. Their armor wasn’t advanced as well, it was chainmail, helmet, Lamellar and cloth with leather. This gave them protection but it wasn’t that much. For example, a volley of arrows could do some serious damage despite the shields and everything.

The Vikings were good warriors for their time being but could always lose to a mounted knight. While they might be the best for that time, the medieval period was full of advanced warriors that could demolish their opponent.  Alcibiades

Preserving Our Past, Recording Our Present, Informing Our Future

Ancient and Honorable Carruthers Clan Int Society LLC

carruthersclan1@gmail.com

 

coacarrutehrs

Uncategorized

Viking Boat Burial Reveals its Secrets

Viking Boat Burial Reveals its Secrets

Six years after discovering and excavating the first Viking boat burial site discovered on the UK mainland, archaeologists have provided a glimpse into some of the mysteries this rare burial reveals.

Post-excavation photograph of the burial site. (Credit: Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2017)

Originally unearthed in 2011, the site in Swordle Bay, Scotland, was the first undisturbed Viking boat burial found on the UK mainland. After six years of work, Ardnamurchan Transitions Project’s findings were recently released in an in-depth report in the Journal of Antiquity, revealing, among other things, the growing relationship between Scotland and the Viking world at that time.

Viking boat burials themselves were extremely rare. Only practiced for the deaths of prominent individuals, the ritual used a boat as a coffin for the body and burial goods. Discovered under a low-lying natural mound close to the shore, this particular site was small, measuring approximately 17 feet by 5 feet, and thought to have contained a row boat that was accompanying a larger ship.

Other artifacts from the burial site. The sword (top); the sword in situ (below); the mineralized textile remains (right); detail of the decoration after conservation (left). (Credit: Pieta Greaves/AOC Archaeology).

After excavating the site, archaeologists were able to reconstruct the steps of the burial. A boat-shaped depression was first dug into a natural mound of beach shingle. The boat was then inserted into the ground, and the body was placed inside, along with the grave goods. Stones were place inside and around the boat. As part of the closing of the site, a spear and shield boss (the round or convex piece of material at the center of a shield) were deliberately broken and deposited.

Pre-excavation photograph after initial cleaning. (Credit: Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2017)

The ship, along with the human remains, decayed in the acidic soil long ago, but the grave artifacts remained, offering a glimpse into the possible origins of the deceased as well as the reach of Viking culture. A single copper alloy-ringed pin with three bosses—a style found in Ireland—was also found, believed to have originally been fastened to a burial coat. There was also a copper alloy drinking horn, thought to be Scandinavian in origin. Other grave goods included a sword, an axe, a sickle (found mostly in Scotland), a whetstone (probably Norwegian), flint strike-a-lights and two teeth—molars from only identified human remains. Hundreds of metal rivets that once held the vessel together, some with wood shards, were also discovered.

The Viking's teeth. (Credit: Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2017)

An isotopic analysis of the teeth (the lower left first and second molars) revealed further information. The individual likely lived on, or close to, the coast, as indicated by an increase in consumption of marine proteins between the ages of 3 and 5. While marine protein was rarely consumed by humans in Britain, it was popular in Viking-era Norway. Further analysis of the teeth narrowed down the place of origin to eastern Ireland, northeastern mainland Scotland, Norway or Sweden.

The weapons included in the burial point to a warrior status and the artifacts and their internment infer high status, but the gender cannot be confirmed. While it is likely a male burial, some of the goods, such as the sickle, are more commonly associated with females. Current Viking’s scholarship points to a number (albeit smaller) of female warriors, as well as the discoveries and excavations of female boat burials.

 Some of the artifacts recovered from the burial site (clockwise from the top left): broad-bladed axe, shield boss, ringed pin and the hammer and tongs (Credit: Pieta Greaves/AOC Archaeology).

While there is still more to learn from this rare burial site, an important finding was revealed in the variety of grave goods from multiple geographic locations: The growing relationship between Scotland and the Viking world at that time.

 

Preserving Our Past, Recording Our Present, Informing Our Future

Ancient and Honorable Clan Carruthers Int Society LLC

carrurthersclan1@gmail.com

 

carruthersCOA

Uncategorized

Viking King – How Was He Elected And What Was Expected From Him?

Viking King – How Was He Elected And What Was Expected From Him?

 

In the Viking society kings were the most powerful people, but having the highest social status was also associated with responsibilities and certain requirements. Unlike for example pharaohs, Viking kings were not considered divine or special.

Ragnar Lodbrok claimed to be a direct descendant of god Odin, but most Viking leaders were “ordinary” people and they were viewed as exceptionally commanding men.

To become a great Viking leader a man had to have certain qualities and attitude as a leader.

This brings us to questions such as – Who could someone become a Viking king? Who was considered a worthy leader in the Viking society?

Viking King - How Was He Elected And What Was Expected From Him?

Left: Mighty King Harald Hardrada – Right: Ragnar Lodbrok portrayed by Travis Fimmel in the TV-series Vikings.

Kings Appeared At The End Of The Viking Age

It’s important to keep in mind that during the early Viking Age there were no Viking kings. The Viking society was divided into three social classes –  the nobles or jarls, the middle class or karls and the slaves or thralls.

Although the different social layers within the population were perceived as ordained by the Norse gods, it was still possible for one person to move himself from one class to another.

Vikings kings appeared in the beginning of the Viking Age, and they were only regional leaders.  The most powerful individual Viking kings who ruled over most of the Scandinavian lands appeared at the end of the Viking Age.

How Was A Viking King Elected And What Was Expected From Him?

The title of a king could be inherited. A man could also become a king if he had good reputation and prominent supporters or was the leader of a successful military force.

Statue of Viking Rollo in Ålesund, Norway. Image credit: Nils Harald Ånstad.

Rollo: Viking Sea Lord, Chieftain And The First Ruler Of Normandy – Statue of Viking Rollo in Ålesund, Norway. Image credit: Nils Harald Ånstad.

Some were considered better qualified as leaders than others. High intelligence and capacity for strategic thinking were a requirement. A Viking king was expected to be ruthless toward his enemies and there was no room for softness.

Ellen LLoyd

 

 

Preserving Our Past, Recording Our Present, Informing Our Future!

Ancient and Honorable Carruthers Clan Int Society LLC

carruthersclan1@gmail.com

cropped-wider-banner-black.jpg

Uncategorized

The Varagians V : Kingdom of Khazaria

Kingdom of Khazaria

Image result for Kingdom of Khazaria

Around the Volga north of the Caspian Sea was a Turkish empire called Khazaria. They had become very rich by controlling the trade between China and
Europe.
The early al-Rus’ traded extensively with Khazaria. The Gotlandic merchants
came on the Volga trade route to the Khazar capital of Atil, and then to the
southern shores of the Caspian Sea, all the way to Baghdad. The Gotlanders
dominated this trade on the Russian rivers from the second half of the 700s
and travelled all the way to the Volga, paying duties to the Khazars and to the
ports of Gorgan and Abaskun on the southern shore of the Caspian Sea. On
occasion they travelled as far as Baghdad. Most Islamic coins in the Spillings’
treasure are minted in Baghdad.
Ibn Khordadbeh wrote in the ‘Book of Roads and Kingdoms’ that ‘they go via
the Slavic River, the Don, to Khamlidj, a city of the Khazars, where the latter’s
ruler collects the tithe from them.’
Khazaria had a Nature Shamanistic religion, Tengriism, where the eight-legged
horse fgures. It is depicted on three Gotlandic picture stones. It has nothing
to do with Æsir-belief and there are no signs of Æsir-belief on Gotland. The
eight-legged horse is unknown on the Scandinavian peninsula.

Khazaria converted in the late 700s to Judaism and became the world’s largest
empire that professed to the Jewish faith, the ‘13th tribe’.
A coin from 837/838, which instead of Muhammad as the profet of god says
Moses is the prophet of god, was found in the Spillings’ treasure. Later we fnd
decendants to these Khazarians professing to the Jewish religion in Russia,
Ukraine, Poland and Lithuania. It is estimated that 80% of those who today
profess to the Jewish religion originate from the 13th tribe.

Image result for Kingdom of Khazaria

 

Preserving Our Past, Recording Our Present, Informing Our Future

Ancient and Honorable Carruthers Clan Int Society

carruthersclan1@gmail.com

 

carruthersCOA